<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE book PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.2//EN" "http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.2/docbookx.dtd" [
  <!ENTITY tex "TeX">
  <!ENTITY latex "LaTeX">
]>
<book id="book-root" lang="en">
  <title>Understanding Reality</title>
<!-- %**end of header -->
  <bookinfo>
    <legalnotice>
      <para>First published by Zolag July 2010</para>
      <para>Revision 1.00</para>
      <para>$Id: ur.texi,v 1.1 2010/07/17 10:49:27 alan Exp alan $</para>
    </legalnotice>
    <abstract>
      <para>by Nina van Gorkom</para>
      <para>Updated 16/7/10</para>
      <para>$Id: ur.texi,v 1.1 2010/07/17 10:49:27 alan Exp alan $</para>
      <bridgehead renderas="other">Understanding Reality</bridgehead>
      <para>Can we find true happiness in life? There are moments of happiness in our life
but these do not last. Pleasant things we enjoy are susceptible to change, they
do not last. We do not really see the impermanence of what is in ourselves and
around ourselves, we always cling to what is actually impermanent. The pleasant
and unpleasant events of our lives condition very much our feelings. We are
slaves of the vicissitudes of life. One day we are praised and then we are glad.
The next day we are treated unjustly and we are humiliated, and then we are sad.
There are in our life. We read in the "Gradual Sayings" (Book of Eights, Ch I,
par. 6) that the Buddha spoke to the monks about the eight worldly conditions
which obsess the world. He spoke with regard to those who have not attained
enlightenment as follows:
&hellip;monks, gain comes to the unlearned common average folk,
who reflect not thus:&ldquo;This gain which has come is impermanent,
painful and subject to change.&rdquo; They know it not as it really
is. Loss come&hellip;.fame&hellip;.obscurity&hellip;.blame&hellip;.praise&hellip;.contentment&hellip;.
pain&hellip;.They reflect not that such are impermanent, painful and
subject to change, nor do they know these conditions as they really are.
Gain, loss and so forth take possession of their minds and hold sway
there.  they welcome the gain which has arisen; they rebel against
obscurity.  They welcome the praise which has arisen; they rebel
against blame.  They welcome the contentment which has arisen; they
rebel against pain.  Thus given over to compliance and hostility, they
are not freed from birth, old age, death, sorrows, lamentations,
pains, miseries and tribulations. I say such folk are not free from
ill.</para>
      <para>We then read that for the "ariyan disciple," who has attained enlightenment, the
opposite is the case. We may wonder what the secret is of the ariyan disciple.
He sees things as they really are and is not enslaved to the worldly conditions.
Could we also become an ariyan disciple? At this moment we are still "unlearned,
common, average folk." From the Buddha's teachings we learn that seeing
realities as they are can make us less enslaved to the worldly conditions.
Seeing things as they are, that is true wisdom. Do we see realities as they are
or do we live in dreams and fantasies? In our life there are realities and there
are imaginations or ideas which we form up in our mind. We do not even know the
difference between reality and imagination. However, in order to see things as
they really are we must know the difference between what is real and what is not
real. We may wonder whether the Buddha's teaching is not a philosophical system
which deals with abstractions. On the contrary, the Buddha's teaching helps us
to know ourselves, to know our different moments of wholesomeness and
unwholesomeness. He taught the way to eradicate attachment, aversion and
ignorance.</para>
      <para>Our thinking about reality is conditioned by many ideas we acquired through our
education an through the culture in which we are rooted. If we want to
understand what the Buddha taught we should not hold on to our own ideas about
reality and we should be open-minded to his teaching. Then we will notice that
his teaching is completely different from our ideas about reality. The Buddha
taught about everything which appears no and which can be directly experienced.
He did not teach abstract ideas. What appears no? Is it attachment, aversion or
ignorance? Or is it generosity or compassion? In our life there are wholesome
moments and unwholesome moments and these change very rapidly. We do not have
one consciousness or mimd, but many different moments of consciousness. Moments
of consciousness are realities, not imagination, and we can know them now, at
this moment, when they appear. Then we will notice that there are many different
moments of consciousness (cittas). When we, for example, perform a good deed
there are wholesome moments of consciousness, but also unwholesome moments of
consciousness may arise. Some slight stinginess may arise, which we only know
ourselves and which nobody else may notice. There may be attachment to the
person to whom we give a gift, or there may be conceit. If we do not know when
there is an unwholesome moment of consciousness (akusala citta) how could we
develop wholesomeness? Through the development of right understanding of the
different moments of consciousness we will better know our defilements and then
we will see that the cause of all sadness and misery is within ourselves and not
outside ourselves.</para>
      <para>What are realities and what are imaginations? We use in our
language words in order to make ourselves understood. sometimes a word
represents something which is real, which can be directly experienced, and
sometimes a word denotes an abstract idea. We must find out what the Buddha
taught about reality, otherwise we will continue to be ignorant of what occurs
in ourselves and around ourselves. then it will be impossible to eradicate our
faults and vices and we will not be freed from our enslavement to the worldly
conditions. Moments of consciousness are not imagination, they are realities
which can be directly experienced, now, at this moment. We can come to know our
good and bad qualities when they appear. We have attachment and aversion with
regard to what we experience through the eyes, the ears and through the other
senses. Before attachment or aversion with regard to what we see can arise,
there must be a moment of just seeing. Is there seeing at this moment? It can be
experienced, it is a reality. Seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting, experiences
through the bodysense and through the mind are realities, they are not
imaginations. They are different moments of consciousness which can be directly
experienced with they appear. The Buddha spoke about realities which can be
directly experienced and there are different from abstract ideas and
imaginations. Seeing is the experience of what presents itself through the eyes,
of what is visible. Seeing is different from thinking about what we see,
different from attachment. Seeing just sees. Hearing is the experience of what
presents itself through the ears, of sound. Hearing is different from thinking
about what we hear such as someone's voice or the barking of a dog. Sound is a
reality, it can be directly experienced; but sound itself does not experience
anything, it is different from hearing. Tasting experiences flavour. Flavour can
be directly experienced when it presents itself. Flavour itself does not
experience anything, it is different from tasting. In our life there are two
kinds of realities:</para>
      <itemizedlist>
        <listitem>
          <para>The reality which knows or experiences something, nāma</para>
        </listitem>
        <listitem>
          <para>the reality which doesnot know anything, rūpa.</para>
        </listitem>
      </itemizedlist>
      <para>Generosity, kindness, aversion, seeing or hearing are mental phenomena or nāmas,
they experience different objects. Sound, flavour, hardness, softness, heat or
cold are physical phenomena or rūpa, they do not know anything. If we want to
know what is real we should ask ourselves: "Can it be directly experienced?"
What is real has a characteristic which there being the need to think about it
or to name it. Everything which is real can be directly experienced through the
eyes, the ears, the nose, the tongue, the bodysense and the "mind-door," through
these six doorways. Thus, if we want to know whether something is real we should
ask ourselves: "Can it be directly experienced and through which of the six
doorways?" nāmas and rūpas are realities which can be directly experienced
without there being the need to think about them or to call them by a name.
Hearing is hearing for everybody, everywhere. We can give hearing another name,
but its characteristic is the same. Sound is sound for everybody, everywhere. We
can give sound another name but its characteristic is the same. Attachment is
attachment for everybody, aversion is aversion for everybody. We can change
their name, but the realities are the same. Generosity is a reality, it is nāma.
We may be inclined to think that there is a person who is generous, that a self
is generous, but generosity does not stay. It is not self, only a kind of nāma
which arises and falls away. Seeing is real, it is a kind of nāma. We think, "I
see," but seeing does not stay, it is impermanent. Where is then the self? There
is no person.</para>
      <para>What we take for a person are in reality only different nāmas an
rūpas which arise and then fall away again. The nāma and rūpa in our life are
realities which can be directly experienced. They are real, but they do not
stay. They arise and then fall away immediately. We are full of wrong ideas
about reality, we believe that a self sees and hears, that a self performs good
deeds and bad deeds, the whole day there is clinging to a self. Wrong view about
reality cannot lead to any good. So long as we believe in a self there cannot be
any eradication of attachment, aversion and ignorance and then we will always be
enslaved to the eight "worldly conditions" of gain and loss, fame and obscurity,
praise and blame, contentment and pain.</para>
      <para>There is no self who experiences
something. The seeing sees, the hearing hears, the thinking thinks. What is the
use of knowing this? It is essential to know that not a self but different
moments of consciousness experience different objects. The can be only one
moment of consciousness at a time an it experiences one object. We may be
inclined to think that nāmas can last for a while. We may believe that thinking,
for example, can last form some time. In reality there are many different
moments of thinking and they think of only one object at a time. Can we think of
more than one thing at a time? This is impossible. Seeing is a moment of
consciousness and it experiences only one object: the visible object. after
seeing there can be thinking of what we have seen or there can be hearing, but
these moments cannot arise at the same time. All these moments are different. We
should know nāma and rūpa as they appear one at a time through the six doors.
Ideas such as person, car or tree are not realities, they cannot be directly
experienced and thus they are not objets of which we should develop insight.</para>
      <para>The Buddha taught that only one nāma or rūpa can e known at a time, when it presents
itself through one of the six doors. We may understand this in theory, but now
we have to prove it through the direct experience of realities. This is not
easy, because we still cling to our won view of reality. Still, we have to know
the different objects which present themselves one at a time through the
different doorways.</para>
      <para>Once I was having lunch with "Khun Sujin," my good friend in
the Dhamma, in a Chinese restaurant in Bangkok. I was served a duck's foot and
when I looked at it I had aversion. Khun Sujin said, "Just taste it, try it,
without paying attention to the shape and form." I tasted it without paying
attention to the shape and form. The taste was good. At that time I did not
understand yet the full meaning of Khun Sujin's lesson, but she wanted to show
me that the experience through the eyes is one thing, and the experience through
the tongue the eyes is one thing, and the experience through the tongue quite
another thing and thus another reality. We join all the different experiences
together into a "whole" and we think" "I am eating a duck's foot." Duck's foot
is not a reality. What are the realities?</para>
      <itemizedlist>
        <listitem>
          <para>There is the experience of visible object,</para>
        </listitem>
        <listitem>
          <para>there is visible object,</para>
        </listitem>
        <listitem>
          <para>there is attention to shape and form, and this is different from seeing,</para>
        </listitem>
        <listitem>
          <para>there is aversion,</para>
        </listitem>
        <listitem>
          <para>there is tasting, the experience of flavour,</para>
        </listitem>
        <listitem>
          <para>there is flavour,</para>
        </listitem>
        <listitem>
          <para>there is thinking of the flavour.</para>
        </listitem>
      </itemizedlist>
      <para>Thus we see that there are different mental phenomena, nāmas, and physical
phenomena, rūpas, and these can be known one at a time. We can begin to develop
right understanding of the realities of our life. If we do not come to know
nāmas and rūpas which appear one at a time, we believe that a duck's foot, a
person, a house or a car realities which exist. However, these things are ideas,
not ultimate realities (paramattha dhammas). Namas and rūpas which can be
experienced one at a time are realities. Our life is nāmas and rūpas which arise
and fall away. When there is a clearer understanding of the realities which can
be directly experienced, one nāma or rūpa at a time, there will be less
confusion in our life and we will gradually learn that there is no self.</para>
      <para>In order to develop right understanding of nāma and rūpa, there should be
mindfulness of them when they appear. There is no self who is mindful but it is
"sati" which is mindful. Sati is a term in Pāli (the language of the Buddhist
scriptures) which can be translated as mindfulness, non-forgetfulness or
awareness. Sati is a mental factor which accompanies each wholesome moment of
consciousness. There are different kinds and degrees of sati. When we are
generous there is sati which is non-forgetful of generosity. When we abstain
from killing or other unwholesome actions there is sati which prevents us from
unwholesomeness. There is sati with the development of calm (tranquil
meditation) and it is mindful of the meditation subject. Sati in the development
of insight or right understanding of realities has a different object: it is
mindful or non-forgetful of a nāma or rūpa which appears now. At that moment
there is no notion of a "self" or something which exists and can stay.</para>
      <para>We cannot induce sati whenever we want it. Listening to the Dhamma and considering
realities which appear can condition the arising of sati. We should have right
understanding of the object of awareness: the reality which appears now, which
is either nāma or rūpa, and we should remember that only one reality appears at
a time. We are inclined to join many realities together into a "whole." I
thought that I could see a duck's foot, and I failed t understand that seeing is
different from thinking and and different from tasting. One cannot see a duck's
foot, seeing sees only visible object or colour. Thinking can think of the idea
of a duck's foot. Thinking itself is a nāma, it is reality, and sati can be
mindful of thinking. That idea of which we think is not a reality and thus it
cannot be object mindfulness. We cannot expect there to be many moments of sati
in the beginning. Sati is non-forgetful of the reality which appears now,
through one of the six doors, and at that moment understanding of that reality
can develop. That kind of understanding is direct understanding of the reality
which appears and it is different from theoretical understanding.</para>
      <para>The development of direct understanding of realities is the development of insight
of the Buddha taught. it can only develop very gradually, during many lives.
Insight leads to detachment from the self. We learn that what we used to take
for self are in reality many different elements, nāmas and rūpas, which can be
know when they appear. My husband and I had been invited to a restaurant where
it was very cold. I have aversion towards cold and I was inclined to say
something about it. But that would have been impatience and lack of
consideration for our host and hostess. I considered that the nāmas and rūpas
which arise are beyond our control. They arise when there are conditions for
their arising. We always think that a self or a person can be master of nāma or
rūpa. Sometimes it seems that we can, but it is not so in reality. The
experience of bodily ease and pain belongs to the eight worldly conditions which
we are not master of. The Buddha taught us to develop right understanding of
realities which are already appearing in daily life, no matter whether they are
pleasant or unpleasant. Sati can arise wherever we may be, in our daily life.
Also when we do not feel well or when we are cold there can be mindfulness of
realities. For example, if there can be a moment of mindfulness of only cold
when it appears, there is at that moment no notion of "my feet which are cold"
or "the cold draught," which are not realities but only ideas. After a moment of
sati is never lost. Sati falls away, but it can condition a moment of sati
again, later on. We may think of the eight worldly conditions, but he
development of right understanding of realities will help us most of all to be
more patient amidst the vicissitudes of life. Eventually the right understanding
of realities will lead to complete detachment and to freedom from all sorrow.</para>
    </abstract>
</bookinfo></book><!-- Keep this comment at the end of the file
Local variables:
mode: sgml
sgml-indent-step:1
sgml-indent-data:nil
End:
-->

